Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is managing a coalition crisis that has turned Israel’s long-running ultra-Orthodox military draft dispute into a potential early-election trigger, adding a new dimension of political instability to the Israel-Iran war footing and to ongoing ceasefire negotiations.

The dispute centers on whether ultra-Orthodox Haredi men, who have historically been exempt from mandatory military service while pursuing religious study, must now be conscripted given Israel’s sustained military operations against Iran since February 28. Israel’s Supreme Court ruled earlier in the conflict that the blanket Haredi exemption could no longer stand under wartime mobilization. Implementing the ruling has proved politically explosive.

Netanyahu’s governing coalition depends on ultra-Orthodox parties whose members regard mandatory conscription of yeshiva students as an existential threat to their religious identity. Coalition partners have signaled in recent days that they will not support legislation that ends or even substantially narrows the Haredi exemption. Secular and centrist members of the coalition have indicated they will not support continuing the war without broader burden-sharing across Israeli society.

The political instability has immediate implications for the diplomatic track. The administration has reportedly proposed to Iran a 20-year verified moratorium on its nuclear program, surrender of all highly enriched uranium, and free commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz as conditions to end hostilities. Pakistan has been acting as intermediary. Continued progress is contingent on whether Netanyahu’s coalition can hold long enough to deliver Israeli buy-in on whatever framework eventually emerges.

An early election in Israel would likely freeze the diplomatic track for several months. Polling, while sparse and noisy in wartime conditions, suggests Netanyahu’s coalition would face an uncertain return to power, with significant gains projected for opposition figures running on themes of national unity and burden-sharing. A change in government could substantially alter Israel’s negotiating posture vis-à-vis Iran.

For energy markets, the implication is that even if the U.S. and Iran can agree terms, ratification on the Israeli side is no longer a given. The market premium being priced into Brent and WTI — Brent is up 74% year-to-date — reflects that uncertainty alongside the structural supply disruption from the strait closure.

Continuing coverage: Geopolitics · Oil Prices.